Man the Frugivore

“To say that humans have the anatomical structure of an omnivore is an egregiously inaccurate statement.” – The great taxonomist Carolus Linnaeus, (1707-1778), a Swedish naturalist and botanist who established the modern scientific method of classifying plants and animals, classified humans not as carnivores, not as omnivores, nor even as herbivores, but as frugivores. Linnaeus writes: “Man’s structure, internal and external compared with that of the other animals, shows that fruit and succulent vegetables are his natural food.” 

It is true to say that man is an ape, an anthropoid ape. All anthropoid apes are herbivores/frugivores, meaning, of course, that the diet consists of fresh, ripe, raw fruits and vegetables, in particular, tender leafy greens and shoots, with the inclusion of small amounts of unroasted nuts and seeds. This is the diet for man. 

In the West, and more recently even in parts of the East, at least in so much as moving away from a plant-based diet, we have seen the results of deviating from this natural plan, this plan being an essential part of man’s true nature. 

Man, more especially western man, likes to think himself an omnivore. Nothing is further from the truth. Look at any chart comparing man with the omnivore and one finds that the human animal shares virtually none of the characteristics of the omnivorous animal. It is a fact, for instance, that the disease, arteriosclerosis, can only occur in herbivores. It cannot occur and is impossible to induce in omnivores, each having their own specific diet, each having their own nature. We find that in nature, each species has its own specific diet and to deviate from that leads to various problems. The cow, for instance, is a grass-eater. Yet in the factory farm, the cow is grain fed. As a result, these natural grass-eaters become very sick. They develop severe acidosis and have to be kept alive with large doses of antibiotic until slaughter. If they weren’t slaughtered, they would die anyway, being so diseased from this forced, unnatural lifestyle. What a horrific scenario! If hell does exist, then we need look no further as we see it manifest in the factory farm. 

I have heard the argument that man is different, that man has no diet specific to his species. Man, I have heard, is the exception and that is what sets him apart from the rest of natural world. Yet why should nature make an exception for man? Are we so arrogant as to think ourselves above and outside of nature? The only thing that sets man apart from the creature that roams wild is that the human animal has broken every natural law known to man and God and he’s got all the disease and suffering to prove it! If we do suffer, it is our own fault. If we do suffer, it is because we have broken the law!

Man is an anthropoid ape and all anthropoid apes are herbivores/frugivores. 

Below is a chart comparing man with the anthropoid ape and the carnivore as included the book, Nutrition and Athletic Performance by Dr. Douglas Graham.

Anthropoid Ape	Carnivore	Human
Walks upright	No	Yes
Two hands	No	Yes
Two feet	No	Yes
Forward vision	No	Yes
Millions of pores	No	Yes
Smooth tongue	No	Yes
Well-developed incisors	No	Yes
5-1-4-1-5 dental formula	No	Yes
Blunt molar teeth	No	Yes
Produces salivary amylase	No	Yes
Mammary gland on chest	No	Yes
Only two mammary glands	No	Yes
Disc-shaped placenta	No	Yes
Lacking claws	No	Yes
Flat nails	No	Yes
Lacking a tail	No	Yes
Flat nails	No	Yes
Long intestines, 12x body length	No	Yes
Stomach with duodenum	No	Yes
Relatively weak stomach acid	No	Yes
Convoluted colon	No	Yes
Susceptible to cholesterol buildup	No	Yes
Sweats through skin	No	Yes
Cools the body via perspiration	No	Yes
Low uric acid production	No	Yes
Alkaline saliva	No	Yes
Alkaline blood	No	Yes
Alkaline urine	No	Yes
Urine has weak odor	No	Yes
Vertical and horizontal jaw movement	No	Yes
Pouch-like cheeks	No	Yes
Lips capable of manipulating food	No	Yes
Flattened facial structure	No	Yes
Drinks via suction	No	Yes